cost of privacy inversion point
sam lessin via www.buzzmachine.com/2010/08/05/the-price-of-privacy/my
Interesting to compare Linda Stone’s 20yr cycle date of 2005.
sam lessin via www.buzzmachine.com/2010/08/05/the-price-of-privacy/my
Interesting to compare Linda Stone’s 20yr cycle date of 2005.
[via http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2010/08/world_populatio.html?utm_source=fee...:+InfectiousGreed+(Paul+Kedrosky's+Infectious+Greed)]
[via email & posterous]
Interesting thought behind this PR stunt.
Is your computer backed up to the point you’d smash it without notice to get a new laptop?
[via email & posterous]
“What matters is context. I’m tired of having companies guess at what my context is. I know what my contexts are. I know how they change. I want my own ways of changing contexts, and of informing services of what those contexts are. In some cases I don’t mind their guessing. In a few I even appreciate it. But in too many cases their guesses only get in the way. The Google search case is just one of them.”
What underlines Doc’s experience is this issue of control.
Anyway, seeing Doc write about this got me thinking about what I was hung up on when I wrote back in 2005:
“These different modes we operate in. This is our context and this is what is getting me hung up about attention. Attention only measures what we look at not why we are.”
http://dnwallace.com/blog/2005/11/11/im-hung-up-on-the-concept-of-context/
Assumptions sap our ability to control what is ours.
Dave
Got into work this morning to find the books written by our friend Beth Kanter that @fang and I ordered had arrived.
Here’s me with them on my desk along with a Adelaide view out the window.
Interesting bit from an article in the New York Times about self-tracking – this bit rang a bell in my head around humanity / culture driving technology creation to fulfil its desires.
One of the reasons that self-tracking is spreading widely beyond the technical culture that gave birth to it is that we all have at least an inkling of what’s going on out there in the cloud. Our search history, friend networks and status updates allow us to be analyzed by machines in ways we can’t always anticipate or control. It’s natural that we would want to reclaim some of this power: to look outward to the cloud, as well as inward toward the psyche, in our quest to figure ourselves out.
Was thinking I could take a pic each train ride to/from work. However I suspect it’d get very boring very fast.
Another appointment another waiting room another attempt to take a semi-decent photo with my old wm5 PDA camera.
#waiting scenes
As an ex Motor Mechanic, this is neat. Real time video of inside a combustion chamber.
Dave
Okay. That’s it. I’ve had enough of seeing this message in iTunes that makes no sense every time I’m in my Podcasts area.
It seems a couple versions ago someone decided at Apple that we never actually listen to audio podcasts anymore. No folks, that’s just not allowed. How uncouth. Don’t you know that since youtube we all watch videos. And podcasts are only ever video. I mean, come on, get with it.
So now when you’re in iTunes and go to mark a podcast feed to indicate you’ve listened to them all you’re greeted with the menu selection “Mark as Watched“.
Excuse me? Since when do you watch an audio podcast? Why doesn’t it say “Mark all as Listened”?
What happened to Apple finesse?
For years Apple prided itself on the little finishing touches that made us feel that things were just okay with the world. Often unseen things were simply just right, like dates changing format with column widths and context etc. But now it seems things just get changed on a whim.
Come on Cupertino. Don’t just settle for flashy wow innovation on new devices. Wow us with the finesse and continuity of thought and attention to detail we are used to.
Powered by WordPress